In the 21st century, WhatsApp has become an integral part of our lives. It is now the most popular messaging platform, with over 1.5 billion users worldwide.
People use it to communicate with friends and family, to share important information and documents, and even to conduct business transactions. But while WhatsApp is a powerful tool, there are some legal questions surrounding its use as evidence in court. The question is: Does court accept WhatsApp messages?
The answer is yes and no; it depends on the specific situation. Generally speaking, courts will accept WhatsApp messages as evidence if they are deemed to be reliable and trustworthy. This means that the sender must have a good reputation for accuracy and truthfulness, and that the message must be backed up by other forms of evidence or testimony.
However, courts are more likely to accept WhatsApp messages if they are sent by someone who is considered a credible witness in court proceedings. For example, if a person has a history of providing reliable testimony in court cases or has been involved in similar cases before, then their statements via WhatsApp may be taken more seriously by the court.
When it comes to matters of business transactions conducted through WhatsApp, such as an agreement between two parties or the transfer of money, courts may also take into account whether there was any dispute regarding these transactions before they were conducted over the messaging platform.
In addition to this, courts may require additional evidence such as screenshots or screen recordings of conversations on WhatsApp in order to authenticate its contents. This can help substantiate claims made by either party involved in a dispute.
In conclusion, it is clear that courts do accept WhatsApp messages as evidence under certain circumstances. However, due to its informal nature and potential for manipulation or fraudulence, courts will often require additional proof or testimony before accepting these messages as valid evidence.